Monday, August 30, 2010



Does Social Security Deny Strong Disability Claims?

The fact is, SSA routinely denies exceptionally strong claims. As a former disability examiner, I particularly recall one case in which an individual was denied at the initial claim level. The DDS (disability determination services) physician who signed off on the case did so using the rationale that the victim's burns did not cause enough stricture (narrowing of tissue resulting in limitations in movement) to prevent a return to work activity. But...the individual had suffered 2nd and 3rd degree burns to 25 percent of the body, confined mainly to one side and the Director of the Hospital Burn Center had taken it upon himself to write a letter explaining that, with injuries so severe, the patient would not be able to return to work. In fact, the patient had very recently been released from the hospital, had gone into shock and renal failure, and then been re-admitted to the hospital for a long, extended period.

Very good disability claims are routinely denied by social security. That is without question. And the question then becomes "Why does social security deny strong disability claims?".

It has a lot to do with how the federal disability system is structured. Bad decisions are made at all levels of the system. However, they (bad decisions) tend to be made most often at the lower levels of the system, which would be the initial claim and reconsideration appeal levels. These are the levels at which SSD and SSI claims are decided by disability examiners and the physicians and psychologists/psychiatrists who work with them as consultants.

Of course, it's not surprising that this occurs. Why? Well, all you have to do is consider how different the system operates at these levels in comparison to the hearing level.

1. Disability examiners are often pressured to make decisions that conform to the decisional patterns of the disability determination services agency they work in. And very often that even includes the decisional patterns of their immediate supervisors. In other words, disability examiners are not exactly independent decision makers.

2. Disability examiners really do not give proper weight and consideration to the statements provided by a claimant's treating physician when such statements have been obtained or delivered.

3. The social security process at the lower levels of the system does not allow an opportunity for the claimant and his or her chosen representative to take an active part in the disability claims process.

At the hearing level, of course, things change considerably. Administrative law judges who rule on social security disability and SSI claims operate independently, tend to give proper consideration to the opinion of a claimant's treating physician, and, if a claimant is represented, will receive the efforts of the claimant's designated representative, either a disability attorney or a non-attorney representative.


Return to the Social Security Disability SSI Benefits Blog




Other Posts

How to Claim Disability Benefits from the Social Security Administration
Social Security Disability Hearing
Is is faster on an SS appeal to hire a lawyer?
Correct Steps for Filing a Social Security Disability Claim
Questions about Disability Benefits from Social Security
How to get Approved for Disability Benefits - Information on disability claims
Social Security Disability For Mental Illness
Appyling for SSD - Disability Application Information
Social Security Disability List of Impairments
Appyling for SSD - Disability Application Information
How long Does it take to get a Decision Letter for Social Security Disability?
Tips for Filling out a Social Security Disability Application
Appealing a denial of Social Security Disability Benefits
Do I need an attorney for disability ?
Disability Determination
Will a Disability Attorney Help You Obtain Your Medical Records?
Social Security Disability Attorney Fee - What a Disability Lawyer can be Paid